October 15th, 2011 by RamonaBatesMD in True Stories
No Comments »
I have meet several amazing people at my new job. Here is one of them: Richard Vaughn (photo credit). The poster isn’t accurate any longer, the 12 should read 20.
Richard is the IT guy at my work place. He broke his back at age 17. This hasn’t kept him from having a full life.
……Shortly after graduation as a 17 year old, a severe accident – a fall of roughly 85 feet from a scaffolding – left me paralyzed and in a wheelchair. This was in the early 1970s. It was suggested that I enter one of several “special schools” for the handicapped. There, I was told, I might learn a vocation and become a “contributing member of society.” Read more »
*This blog post was originally published at Suture for a Living*
September 22nd, 2011 by Jessie Gruman, Ph.D. in Health Policy, Opinion
1 Comment »
Every day in the U.S. countless experts discuss plans and policies to contain the cost of health care using words and concepts that run counter to our (the public’s) experiences with finding and using care. Most of us ignore the steady stream of proposals until one political party or the other crafts an inflammatory meme that resonates with our fears of not getting what we need. At which point, we leap into action online, in town meetings and in the voting booth. As Uwe Reinhardt noted in his Kimball Lecture at the recent 2011 ABIM Foundation Forum, researchers and policy makers “cannot even discuss the cost-effectiveness of health care without being called Nazi(s).”
Our discomfort with the array of private and public sector proposals to improve health care quality while holding down costs should not be surprising. Most of us hold long-standing, well-documented beliefs about health care that powerfully influence our responses to such plans. For example, many of us believe that:
… if the doctor ordered it or wants to do it, we must need it.
… talking about less expensive treatments makes us feel that others are trying to bargain-shop our care and that scares us.
… clinical care does not vary much among our own doctors and hospitals.
… when we talk about the “quality” of health care we are referring to Read more »
*This blog post was originally published at Prepared Patient Forum: What It Takes Blog*
February 24th, 2010 by Happy Hospitalist in Better Health Network, Opinion, True Stories
No Comments »
As a hospitalist I sometimes come across patients who, for what ever reason, refuse to take the medications prescribed by their in-patient doctors. Some patients refuse out of fear. Some doctor told them years ago that taking medication X would make them worse. Some patients refuse out of ignorance of their disease process. Most of the time however, they just don’t understand why the medication is necessary. Some patients just refuse out of stubbornness. And some patients refuse because they have a really good reason.
However, when you’re dealing with critical illness and the only thing that’s going to save your patient’s life is a treatment plan they are refusing, sometimes you have to be in their face with reality. So how do I handle situations with patients who have the capacity to make poor medical decisions but refuse life saving medications? How do I convince my hospitalized patients to take their medications I’ve prescribed? Read more »
*This blog post was originally published at Happy Hospitalist*
June 24th, 2009 by EvanFalchukJD in Better Health Network
2 Comments »
Steven Pearlstein actually wrote that in the Washington Post on Wednesday, right after (another) long rant against physicians. At the end, he offers doctors an olive branch. Or maybe its an offer he thinks doctors can’t refuse:
The choice for doctors now is quite clear: They can agree to give up a modest amount of autonomy and income, embrace more collaboration in the way they practice medicine and take their rightful place at the center of a reform effort that will allow them to focus more on patient care. Or they can continue to blame everyone else and remain — stubbornly — a part of the problem.
After reading Pearlstein’s columns, I’m still sure not why he has such a problem with doctors. I am beginning to think it’s because he just misunderstands them.
Pearlstein is convinced that doctors go into medicine for the same reasons investment bankers go to Wall Street: to make money.
Docs seem to take it as a given that physicians in the United States should earn twice as much as doctors in the rest of the world — and five times more than their patients, on average. Mention these facts and you are guaranteed to get a lecture about the crushing debt burden that young docs face upon completion of their medical training. Offer to trade free medical education for a 20 percent reduction in physician fees, and you won’t find many takers.
Pearlstein has no source for these claims, but let’s assume they’re true, and do the math. The government says that there are 633,000 doctors in the United States, and they earned median salaries between $135,000 and $320,000 a year. If we take a number in the middle — say $200,000 — that means that American doctors earn about $125 billion a year. A big number, but total health care expenses in the United States are over $2 trillion, which means doctors represent about 5% of the total. Can physician salaries really be driving our health care problems?
It seems unlikely. But Pearlstein is desperate for it to be true, so he keeps trying to discount all of the other possible causes of our problems as examples of conspiracies or arrogance or sloppiness:
For example, medical malpractice litigation is a problem…
But one of the reasons malpractice suits are still necessary is because doctors have transformed local professional review boards, which are supposed to protect patients, into nothing more than mutual protection societies
The “infelixible bureaucratic processes” that insurers impose are a problem….
But given that there is overwhelming evidence that doctors tend to order up tests, perform surgeries and prescribe treatments whose costs far outweigh the benefits, you can hardly blame the insurers.
We think it is good to have “clever and creative” doctors…..
but . . . we could all have better health at a lower cost if docs were less inclined toward the medical equivalent of the diving catch and simply were more disciplined about kneeling down for routine ground balls.
Doctors should be applauded for embracing evidence-based medicine…
however, practicing physicians still think that nothing should interfere with the sacred right of doctors and patients to make all medical decisions, even when they are wrong.
Pearlstein’s views on how doctors think are fundamentally flawed. He thinks of them like stock brokers, pushing questionable stock to make commissions for themselves. He’s thought of all the different ways doctors are abusing the system to their own advantage, but he doesn’t seem to have thought that maybe, possibly, he’s wrong.
So, yes, some doctors abuse the privilege of being asked to help their patients. But the overwhelming majority don’t. They want to spend as much time as they can with their patients, collecting information, thinking about their problem, and offering good, sound advice. They are bothered by the involvement of the insurance company or the government or the plaintiff’s lawyer not because they believe they have a “sacred right” to total independence. Or because they think the way to fix health care is to give them “free rein to treat their patients . . . run the hospitals and set their own fees.”
No, it is because these things actually interfere with the doctor’s ability to think, process and decide with their patient on the right things to do.
Pearlstein and other would-be reformers of our health care system need to reconsider their assumptions on what motivates doctors. Maybe it’s something Pearlstein should ask some of his friends about.
*This blog post was originally published at See First Blog*
